Builds Upon: Why the Hippies Failed,
Innovation As Exception to The Rules
There are lots of ‘unique’ people out there who like to rave about all the conformists among us. Yet we’ve all seen how a clique of non-conformists always develops its own brand of conformity.
Clearly, anyone with realistic goals must realize that all social groups, even divergent ones must acquire a new set of norms. With an accepted set of norms comes aversion to those who fail to follow them.
The very critics who lambast conformity usually become dedicated to conforming to their own community.
Therefore most dedicated non-conformists are clearly unable to articulate their ideas and desires on the conscious level.
It seems clear enough to me though, that conformity itself isn’t the problem. The issue seems to be that many people can’t find the sort of group they want to conform with. Without fail, such protesters never hesitate to gel with a group that turns out to be a good fit.
Orthodoxy is inevitable, but this need not be an oppressive restraint for the way of the accepted can take many forms.
An orthodoxy can promote flexibility, creativity, and dynamism as social norms.
That is, those who love adventure and experiment would be Correct. The conservative and comfortable would be Incorrect.
Where there is orthodoxy, there must be persecution of the heterodox. Such processes are critical in defining a society and preserving its defining nature against destructive influences.
Many groups out there sincerely believe they’ll accept anybody. This of course is nonsense. They’re of course only willing to accept people who are willing and able to fit in. But most people seem unable to reflect on the truth of the matter. Most transactions of acceptance and rejection seem to take place on an instinctual level.
There is a fixed set of parts needed for a group to function. An orthodoxy is one of them.
All that remains to one who would create a society is what modules to install.
Though it may be unpleasant to face the fact that there must always be Correct and Incorrect persons in a society, failure to plan for an orthodoxy is an enormous mistake.
If we refuse to step in and define an orthodoxy, than the orthodoxy will define itself according to the forces of nature.
An orthodoxy that does not have to answer to its members is well on its way to becoming the sort of mindless tyrant that rules over mass societies.